Author Archives: AUWU

Counter Conference Announced

In November, Max Employment is ‘Gold Sponsoring’ a 2-day conference called Long Term Unemployment.

This conference costs $650 for a concession ticket.

How is the conference going to come to terms with the reality of long term unemployment when this high cost will exclude those who are actually unemployed from attending and sharing their experiences?

Instead of unemployed workers being given a chance to inform people of their experiences of long term unemployment, the organisers prefer to allow corporations like Max Employment the chance to influence policy in this area.

By continuing the long standing tradition of excluding the unemployed from having any input into policy regarding the treatment of unemployed workers, this conference will pave the way for more out of touch Government policies in this area.

To provide unemployed workers a much needed voice, the Australian Unemployed Workers Union is organising an all-day counter conference on the 9th of November entitled ‘Unemployed Workers’ Speak Out’. For the facebook event, click here.

This event will be held out the front of the Max Employment Sponsored conference (192 Wellington Parade) and will give unemployed workers the long overdue chance to share their experiences on the reality of unemployment in Australia.

If the policy makers do not want the unemployed at their conference, then we must come to them!



UPDATE 1

The Australian Unemployed Workers Union is glad to announce our first two unemployed workers who are speaking at our counter-conference outside the Max Employment-sponsored, $650 priced conference into ‘Long Term Unemployment’ being held in the Melbourne CBD.

Our first speaker will be Branka, who has for the last 6 weeks been involved in an ongoing dispute with Max Employment.
What was her crime? She got a letter in the mail saying she was cut off for not attending an appointment. But that catch is, not only was she not informed about the appointment, she was not even informed she had been transferred to Max Employment!
How is someone meant to go to an appointment they do not even know about?

Come on Monday to hear Branka tell us more about her case.
Our second speaker is Daryl, who recently was given a $54.88 penalty for ‘inappropriate behaviour’ from his job agency for listening to music on his computer during an activity.

According to Daryl, they did not even ask him to turn the music off – they just fined him without even telling him.
Daryl will be coming on Monday to tell us all about it.
More speakers to be announced.

Come along 9am, Monday the 9th of November and get informed about the reality of unemployment.

To RSVP sign up here: http://unemployedworkersunion.com/unemployed-workers-speak/

 


 

UPDATE 2

 

Our third speaker for the Counter-Conference has just been confirmed.
 
Her name is Rikianya and she is vision impaired and long term unemployed. She wanted to do a presentation at the Max Employment sponsored conference on her experiences of long term unemployment, but the organisers insisted she pay $650 to do so.
 
This is completely contradicts a letter the AUWU received yesterday from the ‘conference secretariat’ informing us they “always try and include suitable lived experience presenters; they are always offered free registration if selected.”
 
A quick look at the program and the absence of actual unemployed people becomes very clear. However, Max Solutions – the billion-dollar US owned parent company of Max Employment – has 3 separate presentations at the conference. ‘Gold sponsoring’ the event clearly pays off.
 
In fact, out of the total of at least 53 presentations happening at the Max Employment sponsored conference, 19 are Employment Service Providers and representatives, 2 are labour hire companies, 13 are charities, 9 are academics, 4 are government figures, 5 are companies, and only one is an advocate.
 
Not one of these people on the program presenting are actually unemployed. Exactly how is the conference meant to get a clear picture of the reality of unemployment?
 
Luckily for them, we will be there with at least three great speakers informing them of this reality.
 
Come down at 8am to help us flyer the speakers as they arrive!

Tales From The Darkside: Charlie MUST Surf

By Edward Eastwood, AUWU Media Liaison.

The oval shaped beads are really giving Charlie the shits. The clasp which holds the chain connecting the string is easy enough to remove on the round beads but for some reason the oval shaped beads resist the snip and unwind method and for the hundredth time, rather than coming away clean, the force of the twist has caused the bead to break.

chain-gang

Its also driven tiny slivers of metal into his thumb and forefinger, and at the end of the day he knows his fingers will be sore.

Charlie’s doing a Work for the Dole program supposedly preparing him to be ‘job ready’ in Warehousing and Logistics.

The reality is that he removes the connecting chain between stings of junk jewellery.

In other parts of the site about twenty other WfD ‘volunteers’ repackage items for charity work. Some sort clothing, while others work on repackaging goods for distribution to charity organizations.

Frustration and anger levels simmer just below the surface. No-one’s happy. “It’s just meaningless tasks,” he says.

“When we get here, we’re given different tasks each day. Some of us sort clothing and repackage, while others dismantle junk jewellery.

Everybody hates doing the jewellery.

“There aren’t enough pliers to go around and some of them won’t do the job without breaking or damaging the beads.

Charlie’s bead is thrown in a bin with the other broken beads, while the unbroken beads are collected and sorted into colour, size and shape by other WfD volunteers. The connecting chain is discarded.

At the end of the work period, the sorted beads are collected and tipped into a container, where the next day they will again be sorted into colour, size and shape.

“The game they play with the beads is what really gives everyone here the shits. There’s no point. It’s the same as digging holes and then filling them in. No one here is getting anything like training for work in a warehouse.

“There’s no safety equipment either. We’re all given a one-size-fits-all fluro vest and that’s it! We don’t get safety gloves to protect our hands from the metal on the junk jewellery either.

“If you forget your fluro vest, they make you go home and get it and then come back. They tell you that you have to make up for the time lost so you have to work extra hours.

He looks around at his fellow WfD’s and says that the kind of work people are doing here is the same kind of work that they give you in prison or a community service order. “It’s like Game of Thrones, the same as being a serf,” he shrugs.

There are several large notices posted around the site warning that the use of mobile phones is strictly forbidden and any infringement carries “penalties including reporting any breach of the rules to your Employment Service Provider.”

Charlie usually works on dismantling jewellery but has been assigned to repackaging on three separate occasions.

On the first occasion he repackaged a discount priced confectionary, the type found on sale at local markets or school fetes. The second item repacked was a brand of cosmetic products found in major retail chains.

“They got everybody together on these occasions. Nobody had to dismantle jewellery or resort beads, but they stepped up the pace of repackaging and they watched us like hawks,” he says.

On each occasion, Charlie and his fellow WfD’s were again warned that the use of mobile phones in the repackaging area was strictly forbidden and infringement of the rules carried ‘heavy penalties’.

Heavy penalties most certainly would apply, but not to Charlie.  There are strict rules against the use of WfD labour to replace employees, and the AUWU has stated that it will pursue the allegations with the Department of Employment and the Commonwealth Ombudsman.

Charlie’s story is just one of many, and indicative of a system failing to deal with the victims of neo-liberal economic policies. Rather than address the problem of rising unemployment, the LNP are quietly continuing to  push forward with their plans to privatize all welfare.

Multi-nationals such as Max Solutions and Mission Providence have had their eye on privatized welfare including medical insurance and pensions in Australia for over a decade, and on November 9 at theLong Term Unemployed Conference held in Melbourne, they’ll get their chance to advance their cause one step further.

Significantly, the price of attendance is $550 (concession rate) which puts the cost well out of reach for anyone on the dole.

Representatives from the  government and private sector can rest safe in the knowledge that the fate of the great unwashed will be picked over without the distasteful requirement of having them in their presence.

The findings and outcomes of the conference are easy to predict;

‘The system is in need of reform administered by the private sector.’

As a spokesperson told Fairfax media in 2002; “Long-term, [Maximus’s future] is very much driven by the government direction in outsourcing. Ultimately, if Centrelink is privatised, Maximus would be very well-suited to help.”

Meanwhile, every week hundreds of complaints, comments and stories flood the inbox at the AUWU’s website.

ESP ‘clients’ have their benefits cancelled through no fault of their own, the new Kapo’s demand that the client always be on time for an appointment – notification of which may or may not have been issued – or be breached for being 5 minutes late and then kept waiting 40 minutes while their case officer lets them cool their heels to show them who’s boss…

The bullying and demonisation goes on. The MSM does its bit through a Current Affair; “Australia’s Welfare suburbs – are they unlucky or just lazy?” The usual idiotic prejudices are wheeled out and the mayor of Liverpool tells the audience that; “I left school at Year 10 and I’ve got a Certificate IV in Small Business! Ya gotta stay positive”, he beams.

Ironically, he also puts his finger on the heart of the problem admitting that while there’s been a steady increase in people are moving to Liverpool, “The big problem is that the work’s just not here.”

But…exactly!

Charlie must Serf for his hamburger Momma!

If you have any experiences from Work For the Dole you would like to tell us, contact Edward at media@unemployedworkersunion.com

Your Rights: Frequently Asked Questions

If you have a problem with your Employment Service Provider, chances are someone else has had the same problem and asked us about it.

To help you get answers quickly, we have complied a list of Frequently Asked Questions on our website.

Before you call our National Advocacy Hotline with your problem, please look at the Frequently Asked Questions on the rights of unemployed workers.

Also please remember when dealing with Employment Service Providers: always ask them to justify what they say in writing with reference to the jobactive deed.

 This will prevent them breaking social security law.

And as always, if you would like to make an official complaint about your Employment Service Provider, call the department of Employment on 1800 805 260.

Additionally you can also call the Ombudsman to exert maximum pressure.

National Advocacy Service Update

Recently, our National Advocacy Service received a call from a distressed single mother who was being told she had to start doing Work for the Dole despite only being on Newstart for one month!

Under the law, you can only be forced onto Work for the Dole after 6 months of being on Newstart.

The Job Agent also made no mention of the fact that Single Parents are entitled to reduced Mutual Obligation requirements under the law.

When will the government ensure that these privately owned employment service providers are actually upholding Social Security Law?

If you have issues with your Employment Service Provider, call us today on (03) 8394 5266