Budget 2015: Income management boost

Political Reporter

Income management in remote indigenous communities and low socioeconomic regions will be extended for three years as the government rolls out the new healthy welfare card.

A funding boost of $147 million will continue income management in all current locations, supported with $25.6m for financial counselling and support services across two years.

Mining magnate Andrew Forrest’s proposed healthy welfare card, which prevents the spending of welfare payments on alcohol and drugs, will be allocated $2.7m for consultation with communities and industry.

The funding also will be used to identify the technology and service delivery arrangements for a “commercially delivered debit card arrangement”.

Further funding will be provided across three years to undertake trials of the debit card in up to three communities, based on the recommendations made in the Creating Parity report. Locations are to be determined.

“The trial is expected to reduce harm resulting from alcohol, drugs and gambling, while also testing a role for community leaders in influencing social norms,” the budget papers read.

Funding associated with the trial has not been disclosed, as negotiations with potential providers are yet to be finalised.

Thirty-two service delivery hubs will provide financial literacy education, an indigenous mentoring program and an expanded Indigenous Home Ownership Education service.


  1. Income management is seriously bad policy for some people and i’m one of them for me this will devastate my life. I pay school fees by cash $1,600 per year, music fees by cash $2,500 per year, various mechanical repairs for my car approx. $2000.00 per year, Farmers Markets, Agricultural shows, Violin equipment, study materials, and sport and soccer fees, school uniforms, insurance and many many other things. Please tell the ministers responsible this is the worst thing they can do for a single mother. Please don’t do this.

  2. This is such bad policy! It assumes that every family and person on unemployment is the same, with the same needs and the same problems! Restricting people’s ability to self govern and choose what/how/when to avail themselves of services and cutting off the ability to pay cash for services (as seen in Michelle’s post above) is devistating! The quality of life is so reduced! This punitive measure should only be entered into by people who choose to because it suits their needs and desires where they’re at at the time in their life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *